The “sinner’s prayer” is a hotly debated subject in evangelical Christian circles. It is a prayer that is taught, often with the intention of being repeated, when someone trusts Christ for the first time. It is modeled by the person sharing the gospel with someone and showing them what to pray to express their faith in Christ. It goes something like this, “Father, I recognize that I am a sinner and that I need a Savior. I believe that your Son Jesus is that Savior- who lived, died, and rose again so that I may be forgiven of my sins and reconciled to you. I confess my sins to you and I place my trust in your Son.”
Some versions of the sinner’s prayer ask Jesus to come into the heart of the one praying. This is known as “asking Jesus into your heart.” This phrase is debated, too, because it is not clearly mentioned in the Bible (see JD Greear’s Stop Asking Jesus into Your Heart, for example). However, John describes believers as “receiving” Jesus (John 1:12) and subsequently receiving the Holy Spirit to dwell in them (John 14:17). So in a way, “asking Jesus in your heart” can be biblically justified, if it amounts to confessing faith in him and asking him to send the promised Holy Spirit to live within. However, to be theologically accurate, we should technically be asking the Holy Spirit to be the one to live in our hearts!
What about the rest of the sinner’s prayer? Why is it debated? As with asking Jesus into our hearts, it is argued that the sinner’s prayer is not biblical, primarily because none of the calls to repentance and faith in the New Testament include a prescribed prayer that must be repeated. Consider Peter’s call to “repent and be baptized” in Acts 2:38. No specific prayer is mentioned.
However, there are a couple examples of sinners’ prayers throughout the Bible. Consider the tax collector’s “God, have mercy on me, a sinner!” as one such prayer (Luke 18:9-14). I noticed an interesting one this morning. It is a prayer that is actually prescribed! In Hosea 14, God calls wayward Israel to return to him. He tells them through Hosea to “take words of repentance with you and return to the Lord” (Hosea 14:2).
Hosea then proceeds to tell them what to pray, as if saying “repeat after me.” He tells Israel, “Say to him [God], ‘Forgive our iniquity and accept what is good, so that we may repay you with praise from our lips. Assyria will not save us, we will not ride on horses, and we will no longer proclaim, ‘our gods!’ to the work of our hands. For the fatherless receives compassion from you’” (Hosea 14:2-3).
Continue reading “Sinner’s Prayer in the Bible? (Hosea 14:1-3)”


In Bible and Mission, Richard Bauckham seeks to respond to postmodernism’s rejection of universal metanarratives in favor of particulars by demonstrating that the Bible consistently moves from the particular to the universal, and thus, particulars are the means by which God achieves the universal. In other words, Bauckham wants to show the reader that the Christian faith is not just another universal truth claim that can be dispensed with in favor of particular or diverse expressions of religion, but that the Bible contains a series of God-ordained particulars that open the door to His universal kingdom. By establishing this movement from the particular to the universal in the Bible, Bauckham hopes to provide the reader with the ability to read the Bible in a way that takes seriously its missionary direction by taking both the particular and universal seriously, and achieving the latter via the former (11).
Before reading Putting on the Armor, I must confess that I often viewed the “armor of God” passage in Ephesians 6 as somewhat irrelevant. In a way, I knew it was probably important, but it seemed to be no more than a descriptive metaphor for walking with God, something I could easily skim over and get the point. I remember hearing a small handful of sermons or talks on the subject that seemed to trivialize the description of the armor. These talks of “praying on the armor” or “which piece of the armor are you missing?” trivialized the concepts of the passage so much that it had a negative effect on how I viewed the relevance of the verses. Dr. Lawless’ book has changed my view on the concept of the “armor” by providing me with an accurate view of the passage as a whole, helping me understand each individual piece of armor, and walking me through how to “wear” the armor in everyday life.